Welcome to our Gender&Media Workshop's blog!

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Issue about female genital cutting

This is a post from UNFPA's website.
http://www.unfpa.org/public/cache/offonce/news/pid/5566;jsessionid=D0F6F67C758C369C513CD907BFD39440

Convincing Egyptian Doctors to 'Do No Harm'
Changing minds about female genital cutting/mutilation
7 May 2010

This year, the month of June will be a time of celebration in Egypt. Parties will be thrown for young girls who have reached the age of 13 with their sexual organs uncut, having escaped the age-old practice of female circumcision or, as it is now known, female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C.) Among other things, the month-long festivities will honour the memory of Badour Shaker, a 12-year-old girl from southern Egypt who died in 2007 while a physician was performing the procedure.

But most of all, the celebration will honour the mothers of today's young girls who have taken the decision not to circumcise their daughters. The celebration, which is expected to be repeated in coming years, is being planned by Egypt's Ministry of Health and Family and Population, working closely with the UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on FGM/C towards the total abandonment of the practice. FGM/C is firmly entrenched, but declining FGM/C is still widespread – but increasingly condemned – throughout much of North and East Africa. However, the recent history of the practice in Egypt presents special challenges for those trying to end it. According to the national 2008 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), 91 per cent of Egyptian married women between the ages of 15 and 49 have undergone FGM/C. In Egypt, it is generally performed around the onset of puberty, and it is practiced for different and overlapping reasons. In a 2005 DHS survey, almost three-fifths said they adhere to the practice to maintain tradition, about a third said the practice reduced sexual desire, another third thought it essential for hygiene and cleanliness, and 12 per cent supported FGM to gain religious approval.

While still firmly entrenched in Egypt, the practice does appear to be declining. Today, approximately 75 per cent of all girls aged 15 to 17 have been cut: two decades ago, the figure was nearly 100 per cent. Education also seems to play a role: 87 per cent of women with a secondary or higher education are cut compared to 98 per cent of women with no education. Perhaps most significantly, the DHS survey shows that in 2009, only 63 per cent of married women believed that the practice should continue, compared to 82 per cent in 1995.
The medicalization of FGM/C
What sets Egypt apart from other countries that practice FGM/C is that more than 75 per cent of female circumcisions in Egypt are performed by medical personnel: doctors, nurses and medical technicians. While the medicalization of the practice began as a way to reduce complications, it had the effect of institutionalizing it.

One of the key messages of the ground-breaking International Conference on Population and Development , which took place in Cairo in 1994, was that a number of traditional practices, including FGM/C, are harmful to women's health. At that time, it was performed in Egypt, as in other countries, by untrained village women, traditional birth attendants or even male barbers using crude implements in unsanitary conditions with no anesthetic. Haemorrhage, infection and trauma were common.

"The conference launched a very intensive, medically-oriented campaign against FGM," says Amel Fahmy, UNFPA's Coordinator for the Joint Programme in Egypt. "They talked about the severe health complications of the procedure. This made people afraid and they started going to doctors so that it could be done 'properly' and 'mildly,' without complications. People wanted to be 'modern' so they went to the doctor." For a fee ranging from around $20 to nearly $100, physicians have been performing FGM/C on a regular basis, under aseptic conditions, sometimes with an anaesthetic, sometimes using a localized spray that numbs the area. So, ironically, instead of fading as women's rights advocates had intended, in Egypt, FGM/C became, in effect, medically sanctioned.

The practice continued in this way without much change for more than a decade until the death of 12-year-old Badour Shaker in 2007. Extensive media coverage and a public outcry changed many people's perception that medically supervised FGM/C was a benign procedure. Mounting advocacy against the practice by international organizations reinforced the message. That same year, the practice was banned in Egypt by ministerial decree and in 2008 the Egyptian Child Law made FGM/C illegal and punishable by revocation of the physician's medical license and/or up to three years in prison.

Nevertheless, it was clear that simply declaring it to be illegal would not be enough to halt the practice. The Ministries of Health and of Family and Population, working with the UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme and the USAID-funded Communication for Healthy Living, decided they needed to raise awarewness of physicians to stop the practice.

Egypt launches Doctors against FGM/C
The resulting initiative, Doctors against FGM/C, has trained a core group of 300 physicians in 8 governorates to serve as advocates against the practice. After being trained in the physiological and psychological effects of FGM/C, each of these physicians will conduct a one-day workshop for around 25 other physicians practicing across most of the country. Under the programme, a total of 200 physicians will become master trainers and advocates against FGM/C. Because they will have been trained under the auspices of, and will speak on behalf of the Ministry of Health, the qualifications and authority of these trainer-physicians should be readily accepted by their colleagues in the field. The trainers will then fan out in their communities and work to convince other doctors to give up genital cutting. Over time, the programme will reach most of Egypt's physicians, a majority of whom work in government hospitals and clinics.

The message they promote is that even if it does not directly cause severe medical problems, genital cutting violates the rights of women, can result in significant physical or psychological damage, is not a religious requirement and is not beneficial. These arguments, it is hoped, will persuade physicians to abandon FGM/C and encourage them to recommend that their patients do the same. Patients generally respect their physicians and their recommendations, so advice to avoid genital cutting should be quite influential. The new law also requires doctors to remind patients that such cutting in now illegal in Egypt.

Curbing demand is critical
The creators of Doctors against FGM/C recognize that patients as well as physicians must be prepared to give up genital cutting if the programme is to succeed. Thus, participating physicians are trained not only in the medical reasons for not doing the procedure; they also learn how to counsel parents about the negative effects of FGM/C and how to dissuade those who want to go ahead with it. "The parents must be convinced," says Ms. Fahmy. "Otherwise they will just leave this doctor and go to another one. That's why we need doctors who are active advocates against FGM." Some doctors have initially questioned the programme, arguing that if they refuse to perform the procedure parents will simply resort to untrained midwives where the risk of infection is far greater. "Our argument is that this is not an excuse for medical personnel to perform FGM," says Ms. Fahmy. "The doctor is the highest authority in the village, he is looked up to as somebody who is well-educated, who is respected. So if the doctor practices FGM it sends the message that it's a good practice and people should do it. But when doctors stop practicing this, it sends the message that it is wrong."

Wielding influence as well as scalpels
All of the initial 30 trainer-physicians are influential members of their local communities. Many practice in rural areas where FGM/C is most widespread. Some were already opposed to the practice. Others, who previously accepted FGM/C simply because it was tradition, have become convinced that it is unnecessary and harmful. Other doctors (along with millions of their countrymen) have learned that, contrary to long-held assumptions, the practice does not reflect the teachings of Islam. In July 2007 the Al-Azhar Supreme Council of Islamic Research, the highest religious authority in Egypt, issued an official statement that FGM/C has no basis in Islamic law.

Moreover, training of the anti-FGM/C physicians emphasizes that the practice is not medically sanctioned and violates the internationally accepted medical code of ethics embraced in the words, 'First, do no harm'. "The doctors have been taught that each organ has a necessary, natural function," says Ms. Fahmy. "Organs should not be cut because that is a violation of medical codes." Since FGM/C is now illegal, there is no discussion of compensating the doctors for loss of income for not engaging in it.

To date, several Egyptian physicians reported to be practicing FGM/C have had their medical licenses revoked, and many cases have been taken to court.

According to Ms. Fahmy, it turns out that many physicians have a poor understanding of female genital physiology. "They were not properly trained in the first place," she says. "We found that many of the doctors are unclear about the function of the different genital organs," says Ms. Fahmy. "They lack basic information that they should have had and the programme training has helped them. Many are now on board because they now have knowledge they didn't have before."

The Doctors against FGM/C training is designed to address and dispel – both in the minds of physicians and of parents – the age-old myths that justify and have entrenched FGM/C. Although the Koran explicitly states that a woman should have pleasure in her sexual life, many who favour FGM/C believe that removing the clitoris will remove the temptation to engage in illicit sexual relations.

The trainer/physicians are taught to explain that this is not the case and to point out that sexual arousal is a function of the brain and can occur whether the female sexual organs are intact or not. They also remind their listeners that the vast majority of prostitutes and women in adulterous relationships in Egypt have been cut, and that this has not deterred them from having these relationships.

Upholding the law
The UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on FGM/C and the Ministry of Health are establishing mechanisms to detect and prosecute continuing incidents of FGM/C inside government health facilities. It is believed that fast, vigorous prosecution of health professionals who violate the FGM/C law early in the programme show that the government is serious about ending FGM/C in Egypt.

The Joint Programme has also been training the staff in the Ministry of Health that is responsible for inspecting hospitals and private clinics and reporting violations to the District Attorney. But monitoring the practice is very difficult. Most cases are discovered after the fact because the girl is rushed to the hospital with severe bleeding. Inspectors must then trace the case back to the doctor who performed the procedure.

A holistic approach
Even the participation of nearly all of Egypt's physicians will not by itself eliminate FGM/C entirely. The issue of demand must also be addressed. Changing such a deep-rooted cultural practice will require the commitment and efforts of many sectors of society. "Our initiative will at least enable doctors to say no," says Ms. Fahmy. "But our programme is also working with the general population, helping them to understand the effects of this practice. We're working with communities, with the media, doing a lot of things parallel to this initiative. So there are a lot of other interventions."

For example, the Joint Programme has been supporting 17 community-based organizations working to eliminate FGM/C in 19 communities in four governorates. To date, 4,355 girls in these communities have reached the "safe age" of 15 to 17 without being cut and have been celebrated by local authorities. In 2008, 5,850 families of girls at risk declared their abandonment of FGM/C. In 2009, they were joined by an additional 9,027 families. Although, numerically, these are small victories in a country with approximately 12 million girls under the age of 15, they have taken place in a short time period and represent signs of a shifting consensus, which is a key element in dismantling deeply lodged social conventions such as FGM/C.

Other anti-FMG/C-related activities include local action plans for the creation of 11 Child Protection Committees now being implemented at the national, district and community levels. The committees are responsible for overseeing and resolving child protection issues, including monitoring FGM/C and reporting incidents that violate the ban.

But ultimately, it is public awareness and consensus that will end the practice. This is why the Joint Programme proposed the idea of a month-long celebration against FGM to the Ministry of Health. "We are working with doctors to decrease the supply," says Ms. Fahmy, "but we are also working with the population as a whole to decrease the demand."

Hafiza-Indonesia
Gender and media workshop
Greifswald International Students Festival 2010

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

the little mermaid: a thought on the flight home

It might be a mistake to watch The Little Mermaid on my flight home. Probably it is because I was eating fillet of cod. Or probably because I have just attended a workshop talking about media and gender.

Okay, first thing first. I am aware that the Disney version of The Little Mermaid, the very movie I watched, was an adaptation from a fairy tale by Hans Christian Andersen. And Disney is famous for its happy ending cartoons. Given that fact, I should initially expect that there will be some alterations in the story. And they were there, indeed.

Originally, the mermaid in Andersen's story dies because she fails to meets the terms and conditions set by the sea-witch. The little mermaid supposed to win the prince's heart and marry him in order to be a human for the rest of her life. However, being mute (as her voice became the tool of trade with the witch), she did not manage to convince the prince that she was the one who saved him from a shipwreck. Instead, the prince thought that it was some other princess from some other neighbouring country, whom he ended up married to. The mermaid's sisters fell pity to her, and said that the only way for her to escape from being the sea-witch's slave is to kill her prince charming before sunrise. But she loved him too much, and the rest is history. More or less, everything is about this unfortunate little mermaid and her unrequited love, with several lines from insignificant supportive character to spice up the main dish.

In the movie, every conflict was solved. The sea-witch is dead – thanks to the help of the prince, regardless he is a human being with limited strength to survive the mighty sea. The little mermaid is later a human being, got married to the prince and lives happily ever after. The king, which never been told in the original story but described as a stern father in the movie, gave his bless to the little mermaid. There was no "other princess", but instead the disguised sea-witch who bewitched the prince to marry her. There were even songs performed by a musically skilful crab.

But then I did question several things. I remember to read somewhere about how Disney and its idea of happy ending can be somehow disturbing. When the Beast regains his formerly handsome face, for example I wonder why it is found necessary. Remember, it was the Beast with whom Belle fallen in love with, even though I am quite sure she did not mind to have such bonus: the fairy tale image "prince charming" to "live happily ever after" with. Therefore, I was glad to watch Shrek II and Fiona rejected Shrek's offer to have a physical beauty divine. Instead, she wants to stay being an ogre, "with the ogre I married".

Anyway, the disturbing alteration I found was about why should the little mermaid who morphed into human being and not vice versa. I mean, why does she need to do any more sacrifice? She saved the prince's life already, lost her voice risked her life on an agreement with a sea-witch, even her King father had his throne given to the sea-witch in order to save his daughter from being her slave. The King's advisor also risked his life being hunted by the prince's cook, who was obsessed to cook stuffed crabs. Well, the prince did some things that ended up with the death of the sea-witch, true, but why didn't it occur in his mind that, "Okay, she loves me so very much and has done so much for me as well, I think I can do her a little favour to live happily ever after by her side as a merman."?
Plus, the little mermaid herself was not an ordinary mermaid – she was a princess under the sea, so the prince would not really experience a lowering status. Well, probably he wants to keep his throne on the land, instead of marrying a Princess (with little possibility to be a Queen because she is the youngest). That consideration sounds very much like the villain in Princess Diaries 2 (another movie by Disney, fyi) said to his nephew, "Everything is planned to have you as a King, not to marry a Queen!"

I also perceived the alteration as an effort to mild the prince's lack of contribution to the mermaid's happiness. Compared to how the original story simply said that the prince treated the mermaid as nice as treating his own sister, the Disney movie showed that he did some sort of heroic act to exterminate the sea-witch. And then, oh well, the man saved the day, and what missing was only the cliché line, "Oh, my hero!".
Recalling a previous discussion about "real men" and "real women" in my workshop, I remember someone from the workshop "Life is a Role Play" (they visited us to share a guest lecturer who talked about Star Trek in gender perspective) said about "men are supposed to be the protector". Well, that simply fits the picture perfect – men are there to protect, and women to be protected. But it is not simply about who is stronger therefore (s)he is the one who should protect another, because remember, the mermaid saved the prince at the first place. If it was not because she loved him madly at the first sight, he would be there under the sea with the remains of his ship. I assume that the Disney version is trying to make a "fair trade" in terms of sacrifice done by the main characters, but yet again, the mermaid remained sacrificing more. Living on the land as a human being means no more contact with her underwater family and friends. At least that is what I can assume, because the King said to his advisor something about how he will miss his daughter very much, before he put a spell on her and made her a human.

Another thing is about the sea-witch. I always wonder why it has to be a witch: a wicked female villain with magical power and obsession to rule the world (or in this case, the sea). One thing I like about Harry Potter series is that it puts a wizard instead of a witch as the antagonist – at least to give refreshment on how it is not always women who can be evil and put a spell on the main characters. The visualisation of the sea-witch was also altered; in the original story she was a mermaid (apparently there is no such word as "merwoman"), yet in the movie she has eight tentacles instead of fin. Nevertheless, the sea-witch was described living in a dark abyss with her sea-snake assistants, showing that she is somewhat a lonely woman with no partner to share life or make love to; and being exiled, to some extent, create the evilness. Well, I have no problem on the loneliness issue, for that also happens to Lord Voldemort. But let me emphasize this: we need more evil wizards. Not all witches are evil (like Ursula); some can be very motherly (like Molly Weasley), very clumsy (like Nymphadora Tonks), or even very clever (like Hermione Granger).

That is about it. I write no conclusion – at least for such rambling.


[PM]

Thursday, June 3, 2010

June3:MorizTV interview & Gender Walk


First,let's welcome our guest for today,Stephanie Napp and Tobias Ruch from MorizTV!
They were joining our workshop for an interview, both from us & to us!


We prepared some questions using the 4-R(Representation,Resources,Reasons,Rights) Organization Analysis model for Stephanie, to kick off the interview between us!

It's interesting to find the Greifswald University student TV team consists of 15 females and 5 males.Jobs are divided by a principle of "Do whatever you like!" They try to be objective while reporting,but a more female-like perspective is hard to avoid according to the team structure. Most you can see from the way they portray the people and the stories.
Almost all of them join the team because of the interests in reporting or moving pictures. It's also interesting to find that more males are joining for the written part and more females are interested in the moving pictures. The reasons remain unknown.

For about seven minutes we finished up all the questions for Staphanie,thanked her for the information for study,and went on with our workshop about gender and media studies.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Subversive Strategies of Media Guerilla

Today we had a look on two examples of information guerilla activism related to media and gender. We watched a short video of a funny change in genderroles of toys. GI Joe and Barbie changed their roles and the related needs.

The second example was about unreachable ideals of beautyness, created through wild performances with Photoshop. We saw the postproductional abilities of modifying photographies in the following video and got an impression of the perfect lie.



Activists busted the ad with streetart and brought some very important toolkits from Adobe Photoshop on it. Ad busting can open eyes and minds and make people start thinking about the beauty-industrie, ideals and images of genderroles.




Be creative but careful, because ad busting is not really legal. Its always the best, not to get caught!

jckl

Country-representations



To see how gender can be represented in national promotion videos we looked at two such videos, one from Austria (link) and one from Sweden (link). By the representation of people in the Australian video we could see Austria as a white, Christian and heterosexual society. Women were high represented at the Austrian video, but often with little or without clothes.
The Sweden video also showed a lot of women, but they were mostly with clothes and in lots of different ways. The society represented in the Sweden video is multicultural, differently aged and different sexualities were shown.
I thank very much Elly and Christian Scambour who I got the idea and first analysis about the national promotion videos from Sweden and Austria from at a EU-Workshop at the Genderwerkstätte Graz. http://www.genderwerkstaette.at/

Andrea Bettels

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

June 1st: Gender issues in Star Trek!


First of all, let's welcome all participants/instructors from the other workshop to join us! First time to have so many people in our workshop venue,exciting!


Next, welcome our beautiful enthusiastic guest for the lecture about STAR TREK:Annette Brauer!
She's a Trekkie and she teaches Native American Studies, Cultural Studies and Gender Studies at the University of Greifswald.


First, a Symbolic Interaction Model was introduced:


Ideas meanings-Symbol codes-Ideas meanings.


As a way we will see how ideas meanings are conveyed by symbol codes in the movie STAR TREK.


Statistic studies in the movie:
Only 1(+3) female characters in the movie while there were 13 male parts?!
Only 1 female in the production crew?!
"What's going on there?!"


We were watching the movie clips along the lecture, to see how women were portrayed through the story.

We had a closer look at the female characters in the movie:

1)Kirk's Mother: Winona Kirk -by the scenes of Kirk's birth


2)Spock's Mother: Amanda Greyson -by the scenes of the mother touchs her logic-only(no emotions) son


3)Uhura-emotional and sympathetic


4)Gaula-sexy and objectification


6)Enterprise (the spaceship!It's regarded as a female character due to its obedient characteristics)






Then we came to discuss about a new term:The Male Gaze.


"Stereotyping and objectification of women on screen comes about through the way cinema is structured around..."


Meaning in a movie made most by male producers, the ways they portrayed women were more from a male perspertive. That's an entertainment for male only, at they get the control.


Later after going through all the female characters and loads of observations, we had a discussion about the women roles in the movie and reflection to the society.

We admited that nowadays women are more frequently regarded as "objects" in this male dominat society, while only few women are involved in the techonology & production areas.
But we don't think women are weak at these certain parts, as we still have our best female director in Oscar Awards 2009 and we see more women are also doing good in sports and else professions.

It was a fruitful day with in-depth discussions and critical thinking!



Reported by Terri (Hong Kong,China)

Collage:Faces



When composing the report for Festival Times, found the captured athrill moments of Gender & Media workshops from May28 to June1. And formed the collages.

The workshops have involved some in-depth discussions & unexpected arguments.

You can see different faces,but same seriousness in common.
As the person behind lens,I saw the real beauty resting in responsiblity, passion, and wisdom.

Enjoy!

Terri